What we design
Joiner, mover, and leaver checks; access-change requests; owner routing; exception alerts; logs; and rollback paths.
3PS maps manual handoffs, reporting, alerts, and brittle integrations, then builds automation around the real workflow. Validation, exceptions, human decisions, and a clear operating owner are part of the design.
500+ customers served.
Backed by 100+ professionals and technical resources across our delivery network.
Document who touches the work, which systems matter, timing rules, and where delays or errors enter.
Identify movement, copying, checking, and reminders that can be automated, and the decisions that need a person or a defined approval.
Plan for missing data, vendor failures, API changes, duplicate inputs, and stalled approvals.
Build the agreed integrations, jobs, alerts, and business records with permissions aligned to the task.
Add logs, status, alerts, an exception owner, and evidence that the intended action reached the receiving system.
Compare the agreed baseline with actual output: processing time, error rates, reporting delays, or escalation work where those measures fit the process.
Measures and acceptance criteria are defined before rollout. Evaluate actual output against that baseline, including errors and work that still needs human review.
A payroll change does not reach SaaS or VPN administration, and alerts still go to a manager who changed roles. The missing piece is the handoff between those systems and their owners.
Joiner, mover, and leaver checks; access-change requests; owner routing; exception alerts; logs; and rollback paths.
Approval for consequential actions, review when records conflict, and a named owner when the workflow cannot safely continue.
The engagement establishes the work, authority, and acceptance required.
Map where people rekey data, chase approvals, or move records between systems, including timing and exception rules.
Identify where production data is copied, overwritten, hidden, or difficult to audit before choosing a replacement or integration.
Add input validation, logging, alerts, controlled retries, and an understandable failure path when formats or dependencies change.
Define what successful work looks like, measure the relevant process, and preserve the evidence needed to assess the change.
Before and after process, systems, owners, timing, and decision points.
APIs, files, fields, schedules, authentication requirements, and dependencies.
The response to invalid inputs, unavailable systems, conflicting records, and delayed approvals.
Logs, resulting records, outputs, alerts, agreed measurements, and human review points.
The remaining bottlenecks and opportunities to simplify the process without adding unnecessary dependencies.
Continuing work can include workflow reviews, recurring-issue analysis, integration planning, and readiness reporting.
Scope billing, clinical, order, reporting, security, restore, or vendor handoff workflows around their business impact.
Use actual output, errors, processing time, exceptions, and remaining risk to decide the next improvement.
Examples of continuing work. The agreement defines covered systems, deliverables, resources, working hours, reporting, and response commitments. Hardware, software, dedicated resources, and projects are included only when stated; Critical Response is separately priced.
Bring the objective, the environment, and what needs to change. We will connect the right disciplines around a defined engagement.
DISCUSS YOUR WORKFLOW